The Imminent War
EDITORIAL The Imminent War "There is an alternative: to open our eyes, to do more than sit and wait for the next crisis, and to shift fundamentally the direction of U.S. policy toward Saddam....
...So the editors of this magazine wrote in the December 1, 1997, issue, whose cover proclaimed, not so subtly, "Saddam Must Go...
...William Kristol...
...Wishes are not facts...
...We fear, as does the Bush administration, Saddam's chemical and biological weapons, and, needless to say, hope for nothing more than the administration's success in crippling Saddam's ability to use them...
...It would have been much better if Saddam could have been removed without war, or if he had been removed at the end of the previous Gulf War...
...And he must be disarmed...
...We wish a peaceful resolution were now possible...
...And we hope that Republicans rouse themselves from their post-Cold War torpor and see the Iraqi threat for what it is...
...Said President Clinton, 'This is not just a replay of the Gulf War...
...So war will come...
...It will produce whatever effects it will produce on neighboring countries and on the broader war on terror...
...Saddam will soon be gone, thanks to the courage of one man above all, George W. Bush, very much aided by the equally impressive courage of another, Tony Blair...
...Containment is no longer enough...
...We look forward to the liberation of our own country and others from the threat of Saddam's weapons of mass destruction, and to the liberation of the Iraqi people from a brutal and sadistic tyrant...
...It turns out it really is better to be respected and feared than to be thought to share, with exquisite sensitivity, other people's pain...
...Obviously, we are gratified that the Iraq strategy we have long advocated—and whose contours were further specified in that December 1, 1997, issue, in articles by Zalmay Khalilzad and Paul Wol-fowitz, Frederick W. Kagan, and Peter Rodman—has become the policy of the U.S...
...This is about the security of the 21st century and the problems everybody is going to have to face dealing with chemical weapons.' This is the truth...
...Saddam has proven—he had proven by December 1997—that he will not disarm peacefully...
...It will reveal the aspirations of the people of Iraq, and expose the truth about Saddam's regime...
...But it is not...
...History and reality are about to weigh in, and we are inclined simply to let them render their verdicts...
...But the war itself will clarify who was right and who was wrong about weapons of mass destruction...
...We should act on it...
...Rather than try to contain Saddam, a strategy that has failed, our policy should now aim to remove him from power by any and all means necessary...
...We are tempted to comment, in these last days before the war, on the U.N., and the French, and the Democrats...
...This is a moment for restating the obvious: We hope and pray the war goes as well as possible, with the fewest possible American casualties, and also the fewest possible casualties to all innocent parties, very much including the Iraqi people, who have suffered so greatly...
...A time will come to scrutinize our government's management of the war's aftermath, its equivocations on democracy in Iraq, its inadequate defense budget, and much else...
...We would note now that even the threat of war against Saddam seems to be encouraging stirrings toward political reform in Iran and Saudi Arabia, and a measure of cooperation in the war against al Qaeda from other governments in the region...
...But for now, at this moment of historic opportunity and national resolve, we simply pray for the president, his advisers, and our brave men and women in uniform...
...government, because we believe it is the right policy for the country and the world...
...We hope the president and his advisers will begin to .. . prepare for the coming crisis...
...But we feel no joy and little satisfaction...
Vol. 8 • March 2003 • No. 26
