"Gen. David Petraeus, Man of the Year"
EDITORIAL Gen. David Petraeus, Man of the Year I remember the excitement. It was the week before Christmas a year ago, and I had lazily picked up my copy of Time magazine. And there it was:...
...And the reality is that in Iraq, after mistakes and failures, thanks to the leadership of Bush, Petraeus, and General Ray Odierno— the day-to-day commander whose contributions shouldn’t be overlooked—we are winning...
...And it would mean acknowledging American success in a war Time, and the Democratic party, and the liberal elites, had proclaimed lost...
...The war is not over, of course...
...Time ludicrously chose to make Russia’s ex-KGB agentturned president Vladimir Putin its cover boy...
...To say this was not inevitable is an understatement...
...They said that brutality was essential in subduing insurgents and our humanity would be our downfall...
...There were those who argued that the U.S...
...One additional point: Petraeus’s counterinsurgency stands out not just for its conceptual ambition and the skill of its execution but for its humanity...
...However much they may have desired that outcome, Time was lucky not to select Pelosi...
...That takeover, Time editors and many others hoped, heralded our withdrawal from Iraq...
...And there it was: Time’s Person of the Year for 2006 is “You...
...Wow...
...Petraeus and Odierno used conventional U.S...
...Still: It is as clear as anything can be in this world, where we judge through a glass darkly, that General David H. Petraeus is, in fact, America’s man of the year...
...Petraeus and his generals have shown that Americans can fi ght insurgencies and win—and still be Americans...
...It wasn’t “whack-a-mole” or “squeezing the water balloon” as some feared (and initially claimed)—it was the relentless pursuit of an increasingly defeated enemy...
...Compared with any previous military operations of this size, they were astonishingly successful...
...The heart of the strategy was a brilliant series of coordinated military operations throughout the entire theater...
...We at THE WEEKLY STANDARD thought the chances of success were better than 50-50—but that it remained a diffi cult proposition...
...Successive operations across the theater knocked the enemy— both al Qaeda and Sunni militias, and Shia extremists— off balance and then prevented them from recovering...
...They nonetheless supported the surge because, even at those odds, it was a gamble worth taking, so devastating would be the consequences of withdrawal and defeat...
...The editors couldn’t acknowledge their mugging by reality...
...William Kristol...
...It would mean giving credit to George W. Bush, for one...
...Our soldiers and Marines worked hard—and took risks and even casualties—to ensure, as much as possible, that they hurt only enemies...
...Too quick and deep a drawdown—which some in the Pentagon and elsewhere in the Bush administration are, appallingly, pushing for—could throw away the amazing success that has been achieved...
...The progress in Iraq in 2007 represents a strategic breakthrough for the broader Middle East whose importance would be hard to overstate...
...We are now winning the war...
...That’s fine...
...Petraeus pulled it off...
...military could not succeed in counterinsurgency because Americans were not tough and bloodthirsty enough...
...We deserved credit, Time judged, “for seizing the reins of the global media, for founding and framing the new digital democracy, for working for nothing and beating the pros at their own game...
...Instead, President Bush announced a new strategy and a new commander, General David Petraeus, in January 2007...
...Thanks, Time...
...They just couldn’t make Petraeus man—oops—person of the year...
...And all the real achievements of this year belong to them...
...The measure of their success lies in the fact that so many Iraqis now see American troops as friends and protectors...
...Two military experts told me early in 2007 that they thought the odds of success were, respectively, 1-in-3 and 1-in-4...
...The counterinsurgency campaign of 2007 was probably the most precise, discriminate, and humane military operation ever undertaken on such a scale...
...They were wrong...
...So much for the notion that Americans were doomed to fail in their efforts to mobilize moderate Muslims against jihadists...
...forces, Iraqi military and police, and Iraqi and U.S...
...Our liberal elites are so invested in a narrative of defeat and disaster in Iraq that to acknowledge the prospect of victory would be too head-wrenching and heart-rending...
...The reality is also this: The counterinsurgency campaign that Petraeus and Odierno conceived and executed in 2007 was as comprehensive a counterinsurgency strategy as has ever been executed...
...Nonetheless, reality exists...
...For that and so much else, he is the man of the year...
...And thanks for not choosing the obvious alternative—Nancy Pelosi, who had led the Democratic takeover of Congress...
...That defeat has implications far beyond Iraq...
...In the subsequent 12 months, she and her colleagues failed to impose a defeat in Iraq...
...Special Operations forces to strike enemy strongholds throughout Iraq simultaneously, while also working to protect the local populations from enemy responses...
...In 2007, Iraq’s Sunni Arabs fought with us against al Qaeda, and Iraq’s Shia Arabs joined with us to fi ght Iranian-backed Shia militias...
...Even those of us who were early advocates and strong supporters of the surge, and who thought it could succeed, knew the situation had so deteriorated that success was by no means guaranteed...
...and Iraqi forces, supported by local citizens, chased the enemy from area to area, never allowing them the breathing space to reestablish safe havens, much less new bases...
Vol. 13 • December 2008 • No. 16
