The Duality ot the Warren Report
SAUVAGE, LEO
The Duality of the Warren Report INQUEST: THE WARREN COMMISSION AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF TRUTH By Edward Jay Epstein Viking. 224 pp. $5.00. Reviewed by LEO SAUVAGE Chief New York...
...The results allow him to define the "Dominant Purpose" of the Warren Commission in the following terms: "If the explicit purpose of the Commission was to ascertain and expose the facts, the implicit purpose was to protect the national interest by dispelling rumors...
...Epstein, in any event, has gathered enough inside information on the working of the Commission to be able to trace the "Limits of the Investigation" as well as the "Limits of the Investigators...
...Since its "primary subject," in the words of the author, was "the Warren Commission, not the assassination itself," one of Epstein's main achievements, and one which confers a really exceptional interest to his book, has been his success in interviewing five of the seven members of the Commission (missing only Senator Richard B. Russell and Chief Justice Warren), General Counsel J. Lee Rankin, eight out of 14 assistant counsel, and the senior U.S...
...So Liebeler, too, must have said to himself: "I work for the Commission.' Indeed, Liebeler's reason for protesting against Redlich's text of Chapter IV was, according to the warning Epstein says figured in the memorandum, that such methods "could seriously affect the integrity and credibility of the entire report...
...This evidence is examined by Epstein in a few pages of remarkably clear, sharp, indisputable reasoning...
...What Epstein does not say is that this "dualism in purpose" applied to the assistant counsel individually as well as to the Commission as a whole...
...This dilemma cannot be resolved in terms of what one considers to be 'inconceivable.' To some it would be 'inconceivable' that the FBI would make a repeated error of this magnitude and import in its final report to the President...
...The second horn of the dilemma is even more painful, for, if the FBI's statements on the autopsy are accurate, then the autopsy findings must have been changed after January 13...
...As contradictory evidence and inconsistent details therefore tended to be omitted, the selection process tended to make the Commission's judgments selfreinforcing...
...Epstein's conclusion is that "in a conflict of this sort, one of the Commission's purposes would emerge as dominant...
...Is there anybody who has any doubts about which one...
...The answer may, however, be found in the evidence surrounding the autopsy...
...All these "co-authors" of the Warren Report had remained in majestic-and contemptuous-silence, with the sole exception, as far as I know, of Congressman Gerold R. Ford...
...But even if some of his conclusions are embarrassed and reticent, they are clear...
...Markham and that's all there is to it...
...It indicates that the conclusions of the Warren Report must be viewed as expressions of political truth...
...This is precisely what makes Inquest so fascinating...
...Epstein also mentions Joseph A. Ball, senior assistant counsel of the Commission, who, it seems, wrote a first draft of Chapter IV but was overruled by Redlich and Rankin...
...Thus, Wesley J. Liebeler's 26-page memorandum, which Epstein says was written after Liebeler read the galley proofs of Chapter IV of the Report ("The Assassin"), called attention to some of the obvious inconsistencies I listed in the articles I wrote for The New Leader (see NL, November 22 and December 20, 1965, and January 3, 1966...
...These reveal a flagrant contradiction between the Warren Commission and the FBI as to the results of the President's autopsy at the Bethesda, Maryland, Naval Hospital...
...Epstein says Liebeler's memorandum ran into difficulties with Norman Redlich, who had just rewritten this chapter, but that "some changes were made...
...Edward Jay Epstein, its author, tells us he began it as a Master's thesis in government at Cornell University, with the "initial stimulus" coming from a problem posed by Professor Andrew Hacker: "How does a government organization function in an extraordinary situation in which there are no rules or precedents to guide it...
...That Oswald left the scene or punched policeman McDonald in the face at the Texas Theater proves absolutely nothing...
...As for the shooting of policeman Tippet, Epstein cannot ignore the fact that the Commission's case here rests squarely on the shoulders of Mrs...
...But it so happens that Joseph A. Ball, when one goes through the 26-volume set of the Hearings, appears as one of the Commission's worst interrogators-that is, one of those who seem to be trying hardest to keep the witnesses from saying anything that might lead away from the Commission's pre-established conclusions...
...Ball, according to Epstein, rejected the testimony of Helen Markham as "utterly unreliable," and was also "extremely dubious" of the testimony of Howard Brennan, the super-star "eyewitness" who, the Commission wants us to believe, "identified" Lee Oswald as the man with the gun...
...Whether willingly or unwillingly, the fact is that Liebeler agreed, since Helen Markham appears in the Warren Report as a "reliable" witness...
...But what if a rumor damaging to the national interest proved to be true...
...I do not doubt that Chief Justice Earl Warren is such a "lawyer of experience" But the main preoccupation of the Commission was with "national interest," not with truth, and the real problem Epstein wound up studying concerned the place of what he calls "political truth"-the French have had the unhappy occasion to contribute the expression raison d'Etat-in the activities of a government organization...
...These two purposes were compatible so long as the damaging rumors were untrue...
...Perhaps it was worse before, but as far as I am concerned, I still see in the Report all the untrue and misleading assertions Liebeler is said to have denounced on September 6, 1964...
...For the Warren Commission is not an ordinary "government organization" placed in an extraordinary situation...
...If the FBI reports are accurate, as all the evidence indicates they are, then a central aspect of the autopsy was changed more than two months after the autopsy examination, and the autopsy report published in the Warren Report is not the original one...
...For example, after telling the inside story on the Report's crudely titled Chapter IV, "The Assassin," and after quoting Liebeler's and Ball's criticisms and Redlich's replies, Epstein offers the following concluding paragraph: "Although Chapter IV is not a 'prosecutor's brief in the sense that it presents only one side of the case, it certainly is not an impartial presentation of the facts...
...In his role as editor, he had to select evidence that supported the Commission's judgments...
...According to Epstein, for instance, Liebeler was fully aware of the misleading character of the statement concerning the presence of the rifle in the Paine's garage "until the morning of the assassination.' And, like most normal people, he found the Report concerning "Oswald's Rifle Capability" to be "contrary to the evidence...
...In his interview with Epstein, Ball revealed that during a "reconstruction" of the assassination in Dallas on March 20, 1964, Brennan had "difficulty seeing a figure in the window," much less identifying someone from the sidewalk...
...None of the failures of the Warren Commission, in fact, can be attributed to lack of rules or precedents...
...Thus Epstein's case study, as he discovered himself while advancing in his research, turned out to apply to something completely different than the case he set out to study...
...Joseph A. Ball has convinced Epstein that "the chain of evidence (against Oswald) was indeed compelling," and "although the possibility the Oswald was unwittingly involved (that is, 'framed') was apparently not explored, other circumstances-such as the shooting of police officer J. D. Tippit-severely diminished the credibility of this possibility...
...Having rejected blind faith, he is obviously afraid to fall into demonology...
...only conclusions...
...And here we find no arguments, no proofs, no reasoning...
...only of public relations...
...Whatever the case, these few unsubstantiated pages damage the lasting importance of an otherwise brilliant and constructive achievement...
...Air Force historian who had special responsibility for writing the Report...
...The Commission, for instance, could have avoided many of its "errors" by simply adopting the time-tested rule of cross-examination, "the greatest legal engine ever invented for the discovery of truth," as John Henry Wigmore already stated in 1905, adding that "there has probably never been a moment's doubt upon this point in the mind of a lawyer of experience...
...Epstein leans backward to be fair not only to individuals but to the Commission generally...
...Since he has also read in the Liebeler memorandum how unconvincing some of the other charges against Oswald appear even to the eyes of Commission staff members, Epstein's unhesitating acceptance of the Commission's accusations...
...indeed the Commission's investigation and conclusions were, in the final analysis, predicated on the accuracy of the FBI reports...
...Helen Markham, about whom he has heard from both Liebeler and Ball...
...And that reopens, once more, the essential question of which bullets hit the President, and which rifle fired them...
...Regrettably after thus deceptively contributing to the necessary task of replacing "political truth"-that is, a well-intentioned lie-with the real facts, Epstein nevertheless accepts without examination or question, the Commission's "political truth" about Oswald's guilt: While rejecting the Commission's affirmation about the lone assassin and showing convincingly that there must have been two assassins, he accepts very lightheartedly the assertion, as one of two if not alone, Lee Harvey Oswald shot at the President...
...to others it would be inconceivable that the Warren Commission would substantially alter the basic facts...
...Reviewed by LEO SAUVAGE Chief New York correspondent, Le Figaro...
...I have nothing personal, of course, against Wesley J. Liebeler, whom I do not know, and whom I cite only because of the part he plays in Epstein's book...
...So, what good did he and his memorandum do...
...author, "The Oswald Affair," to be published in September This is indeed a fascinating book...
...The Congressman apparently did not think it unethical to publish a $6.95 report of his own called Portrait of the Assassin, which advertised him as "A member of the Warren Commission" on the jacket...
...And here the young man from Cornell University almost looses his academic calm...
...There is a frightening reply which Norman Redlich is quoted as having given Liebler concerning the rifle tests: "The Commission judged it is an easy shot, and I work for the Commission.' Redlich, apparently, used a similar formula about Helen Markham, one of the Commission's most appalling star witnesses...
...In the final analysis, Redlich did 'work for the Commission.' That he is a man of high personal integrity only adds to the poignancy of the situation...
...I hope this was not to make the rest of his book more palatable...
...Now some of the others have not only talked to Epstein, but Assistant Counsel Wesley J. Liebeler even seems to have let him have a copy of a 26-page memorandum criticizing the Report?, chapter on "The Assassin.' According to the book, Liebeler submitted this to the Commission on September 6, 1964...
...That is because in his preface he has, rather arbitrarily, divided most of the writing on the assassination "into two diametrically opposed categories: demonology and blind faith...
...No less important, it reopens the whole moral issue surrounding the case, and Epstein perfectly exposes the dilemma: "On one hand, if the FBI reports distorted such a basic fact of the assassination, doubt is cast on the accuracy of the FBI'S entire investigation...
...I suppose there will be some denials and rectifications, though at the time of this writing, if "everyone's yelling 'mis-quote' " as Newsweek says, quoting one of the "staff alumni" described as "hopping mad," the protest is remarkably anonymous...
...There is therefore still no consideration of truth or justice...
...And Liebeler is the Assistant Counsel who systematically ignored the obvious but unpleasant implications of the presence of a repair tag in the name of Oswald on the workbench of an Irving gunsmith (see NL, January 3, 1966...
...Later Epstein insists again: "Oswald's subsequent actions -leaving the scene, shooting a policeman, and resisting arrest-certainly were not the actions of an innocent person...
...His conclusion is that "the FBI reports are not erroneous...
...If this is in fact the case, the significance of this alteration of facts goes far beyond merely indicating that it was not physically possible for a lone assassin to have accomplished the assassination...
...This gloved approach disappears, however, when Epstein comes to deal with the four-volume FBI report of December 9, 1963, which became available to the public early this year at the National Archives in Washington, and a "Supplemental Report" dated January 13, 1964, excerpts of which he makes public for the first time...
...This would mean that the document in the Warren Report which purports to be the original autopsy report is not...
...and the absence of rules and precedents to guide it was of minor importance, I would even say of no importance at all, compared to the presence of political preoccupations-or prejudices-to dictate each of its steps...
...When Liebeler, who had questioned her and caught her in full perjury, told Redlich that her testimony was "contradictory" and "worthless," Redlich is said to have responded: "The Commission wants to believe Mrs...
...The Commission's explicit purpose would dictate that the information be exposed regardless of the consequences, while the Commission's implicit purpose would dictate that the rumor be dispelled regardless of the fact that it was true...
...But Epstein could not answer the question as stated...
...In fact, they leave no substance whatsoever to the Commission's audacious speculation that Governor John Connally was hit by a bullet which had first pierced the President's throat...
Vol. 49 • June 1966 • No. 13