Democracy and Tradition

...The most essential democratic virtue is the ability to coexist, on terms of mutual respect, with proponents of these diverse accounts...

...Stigmatizing those with whom one disagrees, as Stout does, as practitioners of "docility" and "slavish idolatry" is a continuation of the problem, not the path to a solution...

...And so forth...

...If Stout hoped to offer in this book an ac-count of American democracy that conscientious traditionalists can accept, I must reluctantly conclude that he has failed...

...It is easy to take umbrage at the anti-democratic sentiments of the new traditionalists, but harder to respond to them...

...The inevitable result is social fragmentation and moral nihilism...

...Democracy contains—must contain—many competing accounts of excellence...

...From 1993 to 1995, he served as deputy assistant to President Bill Clinton for domestic policy...

...In Stout's view, Rawls's contractualism begins well, as an effort to locate reasonable agreement that respects the fact of, and responds to, the contemporary diversity of conceptions of what composes the good life...

...If either were essential to democracy, all orthodoxy would be at war, in principle, with democracy...

...The new traditionalists accept Rawlsian philosophy as an accurate description of modern democratic society and respond by rejecting democracy as hostile to genuine faith...

...Lurking beneath the surface of the new traditionalists' charge that democracy is at war with tradition is a different, more challenging claim that Stout fails to discern (or ducks): democracy is a tradition, but its moral substance is flawed, even contemptible, say many new traditionalists...

...If the faithful are required to check their convictions in the vestibule as a condition of entering the house of democracy, then the price of admission is too high, the new traditionalists say...

...it has no force against critics who see democracy for what it is and nonetheless (or as they would say, accordingly) reject it in favor of an undemocratic ideal of human existence...

...I do not see why...

...A greater openness to the actual texture of lived democratic life would enable them to see that democracy can make a place for moral excellence and faith...

...A thick description of democracy may have per-suasive force against critics whose unD Commonweal 24 January 30, 2004 derstanding of democracy is phenomenologically thin...

...This is fair enough, as far as it goes, but it does not go quite far enough...

...According to Stout, the late John Rawls and his followers dominate the study of democracy in philosophy and political science departments, while the "new traditionalists" led by Alasdair Maclntyre (After Virtue) and Methodist theologian Stanley Hauerwas are equally dominant in theological seminaries...

...Rationalism, individualism, and unfettered liberty corrode bonds, restraints, and tacit beliefs...

...William A. Galston is professor in the University of Maryland School of Public Affairs, director of the Institute for Philosophy and Public Policy, and founding director of the Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement...

...Fortunately for democracy, neither is...

...Many forms of religious orthodoxy, Catholicism for one, that affirm a gap between human and divine morality have made their peace with democracy...

...As he himself observes, contemporary Augustinians have been good and conscientious democrats...

...With the publication of A Theory of Justice more than thirty years ago, Rawls revived the social-contract tradition by drawing on Immanuel Kant's account of individual autonomy...

...Stout gives us an ac-count of piety, and of the human moral life, that might be called "half of Abraham"—the Abraham who questions God's intention to destroy Sodom, but not the Abraham who accepts the command to sacrifice Isaac...

...I do not see why a religious believer who embraces some form of orthodoxy would be any happier with Emersonian individuality than with Rawlsian rational-ism...

...Rawls's effort to expel religious discourse from the process of public justification is both mistaken in theory and counterproductive in practice...

...It is not,and cannot be, an account of democratic culture, or of democratic excellence, that all self-aware democratic citizens are bound to accept...

...True virtue exalts, not the self, but rather what transcends the self, which is at odds with Emerson's idolatry of the imperial self...

...BOSTON COLLEGE INSTITUTE OF RELIGIOUS EDUCATION AND PASTORAL MINISTRY Continuing a Tradition of Excellence in Educating for Ministry since 1971 GRADUATE DEGREE PROGRAMS MA IN PASTORAL MINISTRY With concentrations in: Church Leadership Hispanic Ministry Liturgy and Worship Pastoral Care Religious Education Social Justice Spirituality Youth Ministry MEd CAES PhD IN RELIGION AND EDUCATION DUAL DEGREES: MA/MSW MA/MA Counseling Psychology MA/MS Nursing MA/M Ed Educational Administration CONTINUING EDUCATION CERTIFICATE IN ECCLESIAL MINISTRY Collaborative Leadership Concentration Liturgy Concentration INTERNET DISTANCE EDUCATION POST-MASTER'S CERTIFICATE IN THE PRACTICE OF SPIRITUALITY WEEKEND COURSES WORKSHOPS, SEMINARS AND LECTURES http://www.bc.edu/irepm IN ADDITION: Generous Financial Aid Special Rate for Those Employed or Volunteering in a New England Diocese Graduate Student Housing Enriching Liturgical and Social Opportunities Both Academic Year and Summer Study FOR MORE INFORMATION: Mary Magennis Boston College Institute of Religious Education and Pastoral Ministry (IREPM) Chestnut Hill, MA 02467-3931 800-487-1167 or 617-552.8440 fax: 617-552-0811 email: irepm@bc.edu Commonweal 15 January 30, 2004...

...In particular, American religion is as intrinsic to American culture, and as compatible with democracy, as is secular liberalism, and there is less difference between the way we hold religious and secular beliefs than most secularists suppose...

...As a consequence, whenever possible the faithful must retreat into communities of shared conviction...

...Stout's critique of the new tradition-alists is astute...

...Stout's loving evocation of the Emersonian tradition is a personal profession of faith...

...In their place, Stout pro-poses what he regards as a more adequate description and justification of American democracy—a brand of pragmatism that combines Hegel's moral expressivism with Emerson's account of democratic individuality...

...Stout is right to say that for the new traditionalists, the basic question to ask of any society is what kinds of people it characteristically produces...

...When that is not the result, they must fight against secularist coercion as best they can...

...They begin to go astray, he argues, when they accept the claims of secular liberal philosophy at face value, as an adequate characterization of mod-ern democratic culture...

...William A. Galston emocracy and Tradition is a long and complicated book that offers a diagnosis of what philosopher Jeffrey Stout (Ethics after Babel) regards as unsatisfactory ways of thinking about democracy, and a prescription for understanding it better...

...Stout argues that Rawls's revised theory fails in its own terms, as a theorized expression of the public culture of our democratic society...

...Worse, while we can only lead morally meaningful lives—that is, lives of virtue and character—within communities constituted by shared traditions, modern democracy is at war with tradition...

...Against his intention, Stout replicates Rawls's misstep...

...The virtuous human being accepts, with docility and even gratitude, the constraints of human nature and the cosmos, limits that the restless democratic will cannot abide and against which it constantly chafes, or wars...

...Virtue requires deference, hierarchy, even awe, which democracy's shallow egalitarianism undercuts...

...Stout's account of democratic theory as the theoretical expression of democratic culture turns out to be a two-edged sword: while it offers rich internal resources of moral narratives (Stout writes interestingly about his local soccer team as a community of shared values, for example), it is of little force against external critiques...

...What Stout does not see, or say, is that the new traditionalists reject modern democracy au fond because they do not like its human products or way of life...

...Much as political scientists argue that the secular liberal legal and social gains of the 1960s triggered a religious conservative backlash, Stout claims that liberal secularist gains contributed to a theological counterrevolution...

...It is, at most, one strand in the strong rope of democracy in America...

...He seems to suggest that the compatibility of religion and democracy presupposes the self-sufficient adequacy of human morality...

...That is to say—and this is Stout's main point—democracy, far from being the enemy of all tradition, is itself a tradition, with its own canon of conduct, discourse, and virtues...

...Rawls responded by shifting the basisof his theory from Kantian universalism to the view, influenced by Hegel, that political theory draws from, and express-es, a particular "public culture...

...His account of what he calls "self-reliant piety" insists that human moral under-standing is adequate to judge the nature and deeds of God...

...He celebrates self-reliance, taking it to theological heights...

...Each of these pervasive stances distorts and diminishes American democracy, Stout argues...

...Democratic culture is far richer and more diverse, Stout argues, than the terms of Rawls's etiolated rationalism can capture...

...The democratic individuality of Emerson and Whitman, which Stout embraces, is nothing like a comprehensive account of American democratic culture...

...By representing the Emersonian tradition as the core of American culture, he needlessly stacks the deck against competing possibilities that give more value to respect for authority and for the inherited wisdom of the past...

...Critics argued that the narrowness of Rawls's philosophical lexicon undercut the capaciousness of his moral aims, thus failing to take diversity, especially religious pluralism, seriously enough...

...Stout's passionate Emersonianism makes it even harder to respond to the new traditionalists...

...Nor do I think Stout has made the case that Emersonian perfectionism is essential to the vindication of democracy...