What kind of 'war'?: A journalist, a diplomat, a foreign-policy expert, and a theologian contemplate our future.

Russett, Bruce Martin

Bruce Martin Russett The administration tells us this will last a year or more. They understate. Think decades. One might say that Palestine has become the world: terrorism, retaliation,...

...The situation is one of choice, and the exercise of our free will...
...So too does prudence— Commonweal 9 September 28,2001 the more we violate those principles the more we spawn new terrorists...
...A massive American military response is probably unavoidable, but neither anger nor determination should blind us to certain implications...
...They were restrained in large part by public sentiments in the United States and our allies...
...But democratic peoples don't like long, costly wars without a prospect of victory...
...Bruce Martin Russett is Dean Acheson Professor of International Relations, Yale University...
...Bush seems finally to understand that...
...Civilians will die as a result of our military strikes, but we must keep those deaths proportionate to our legitimate security goals and to what we are trying to prevent...
...Third, we must give serious attention to the Arab-Israeli conflict...
...Failure in Afghanistan was perhaps the single biggest cause of the collapse of the Soviet Union...
...Some perception that this country is substantially obeying international law and elementary morality about not deliberately killing innocent people— not sinking to the level of our antagonists—will be essential...
...Commonweal I O September 28, 2001...
...They have a strategy to provoke us into an extended struggle that will destroy our values...
...Think Vietnam...
...In short, far more than automatic retaliation is at issue...
...Democracies do fight well, and win most of their wars...
...Military and economic power alone won't do it...
...One might say that Palestine has become the world: terrorism, retaliation, counter-retaliation, in cycles without end...
...The Clinton and first Bush administrations conducted their wars (Kosovo and the Gulf) in a restrained fashion so as to minimize civilian casualties...
...In a long war we will need many allies...
...Remember that the first Bush administration declined to occupy Iraq ten years ago when it would have been far easier...
...That's hardly the whole cause of this terrorism, but without a peace of sorts in Palestine there will not be even a peace of sorts in the world...
...Think of all the terrorist organizations—not all linked to Islamic groups—who take aim at Western capitalist and individualist culture...
...Our opponents may be evil, but they are not stupid or crazy...
...First, we must not descend to indiscriminate destruction...
...Not perfectly, but with much more restraint than in Vietnam or in World War II...
...Airport security in this country has been a joke, and can no longer be...
...And the Soviets were not soft or faint-hearted...
...Consider the topography, the local support from all who are poor, angry, and looking for someone to blame...
...But we must not lose what we are fighting for, which is in large part our freedom (including freedom from fear of the state...
...All of us are capable of evil acts...
...Second, we must defend civil liberties...
...Holding together a long-haul alliance including Islamic governments and Islamic peoples will be very, very hard...
...The just-war principles require it...
...More intelligence gathering may include eavesdropping...

Vol. 128 • September 2001 • No. 16


 
Developed by
Kanda Sofware
  Kanda Software, Inc.