What kind of 'war'?: A journalist, a diplomat, a foreign-policy expert, and a theologian contemplate our future.
Porter, Jean
Jean Porter In the wake of the appalling events of September 11, we are united by feelings of outrage, grief, and fear. These reactions are surely appropriate and call for expression. But as we...
...And finally, direct attacks on civilians can never be morally justified, and the inevitable risk to civilians in military actions should be minimized...
...We should have learned that by now...
...On Saturday, the Times reported that during his remarks in a prayer service at Washington's National Cathedral, President George W. Bush proclaimed that we have a responsibility to history to "answer these attacks and rid the world of evil...
...We must remind our country's leaders, and our fellow citizens, that in order to be morally justified, military force must be proportionate...
...But if our nation's leaders are going to style this conflict as a war, then we must remember that even within war there are moral constraints on the use of force...
...We had better hope that that is all they are...
...We have been provoked beyond anything we ever expected, but that does not give us license to respond in kind...
...Jean Porter is professor of theology at the University of Notre Dame...
...But as we move beyond the shock of the immediate events to consider how we as a nation should respond to them, we have to remember that there are better and worse ways to translate our initial reactions into actions...
...We cannot fight terrorism by becoming terrorists ourselves...
...Some reactions are likely to be effective, others may be immediately satisfying while increasing our vulnerability in the long run...
...The use of force must have a reasonable chance of success...
...I am writing these words on the Saturday morning following the terrorist activities...
...What practical aims would be advanced by attacking countries that do not have the power to stop the terrorists from operating within their borders...
...But my main concern at the moment has to do with the moral implications of such a policy...
...We do not have the power to end terrorism around the world—much less to rid the world of evil...
...Commonweal 10 September 28, 2001...
...The Catholic community has a grave responsibility to take leadership here, because we are custodians of a historic tradition of reflection on the ways in which justice constrains the use of military force...
...The outright destruction of nation-states can never be a proportionate response, even to severe provocations...
...Pragmatically, a policy informed by these sentiments would be a disaster...
...We should be thinking of Vietnam instead...
...And those of us within the Catholic community should take the lead in reminding the nation of something else: There are some courses of action that we should rule out because they are not morally acceptable...
...Even if we could, such a price for our security would be too high...
...At the moment, our responses seem to be colored by thoughts of World War II...
...Perhaps these, and the many similar comments that we have heard from our nation's leadership, are simply hyperbole—understandable responses to a staggering tragedy, not to be taken seriously as enunciations of policy...
...Yesterday, Friday, the Nezv York Times quoted Paul Wolfowitz, the deputy secretary of defense, as saying, "It's not just a matter of capturing people and holding them accountable, but removing the sanctuaries, removing the support systems, ending states who sponsor terrorism...
...Like many others, I am troubled by the easy invocation of war, with its misleading implication that we are engaged in hostilities with whole nations, and not with independent groups of terrorists...
Vol. 128 • September 2001 • No. 16
